<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mack Brass on Euphonium Studio</title><link>https://euphonium.studio/maker/mack-brass/</link><description>Recent content in Mack Brass on Euphonium Studio</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://euphonium.studio/maker/mack-brass/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mack Brass EU1150S</title><link>https://euphonium.studio/instruments/mack-brass-eu1150s/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://euphonium.studio/instruments/mack-brass-eu1150s/</guid><description>&lt;!-- EDITOR: verdict in your own voice. The database's clearest "stencil = clone" case:
 Mack's own page says it's "based on the Yamaha 642," the specs match the 642
 exactly (.590-.661 bore, 11.8"/300mm bell, 4-valve comp Monel), and it sells for
 $1,595 vs the real 642's ~$5k. Silver only, gold-trim option, case + mouthpiece,
 large shank. "8000 sold, #1 US retailer of this model." Report the 642 lineage as
 MACK'S claim. Prime cross-link to the stencil explainer (this IS the explainer's
 thesis) and an honest side-by-side with the Yamaha YEP-642 Neo record. --&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mack Brass EU5500</title><link>https://euphonium.studio/instruments/mack-brass-eu5500/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://euphonium.studio/instruments/mack-brass-eu5500/</guid><description>&lt;!-- EDITOR: Mack's OTHER compensating euphonium (distinct from the 642-based EU1150S).
 Confirmed only as "compensating" from the catalog; bore/bell/spec and any design
 lineage pending its product page (URL above). Fetch to complete. --&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>